News

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court, while acquitting a murder convict, emphasized the necessity of impeccable quality in evidence related to extra-judicial confessions. The court expressed skepticism regarding a confession made to the brothers of the deceased, questioning the unusual circumstance of an accused admitting guilt to close acquaintances. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay …

Supreme Court Demands Impeccable Credibility in Extra-Judicial Confessions: Doubts Cast on ‘Confession’ to Deceased’s Brother Read More »

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court quashed a specific performance suit filed in 1999, seeking enforcement of a 1986 sale agreement. Justices Rajesh Bindal and Vikram Nath opined that the aggrieved party’s delay of 13 years before initiating legal action was a critical factor in their decision. The case revolved around a 1986 agreement …

Timely Action Triumphs: Supreme Court Dismisses 1986 Sale Agreement Suit Filed 13 Years Later Read More »

In a crucial legal scrutiny, the Supreme Court is poised to assess the validity of citing a post-acquittal alteration in law as grounds for condoning delays and challenging acquittal findings. The distinguished bench comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Sanjay Karol recently initiated proceedings on November 6, issuing a notice in response to a Special Leave …

 Supreme Court to Deliberate Impact of Subsequent Legal Changes on Acquittal Appeals Read More »

Amidst the sprawling landscape of litigation accusing numerous generic pharmaceutical companies of colluding to fix prices on hundreds of drugs, a fierce venue battle has erupted. Industry titans, including Teva, Sandoz, and Aurobindo, are vehemently opposing a move by several states, led by Connecticut, to decentralize the antitrust proceedings. In a collective plea to the …

Pharmaceutical Powerhouses Battle Venue War Amidst Price-Fixing Allegations Read More »

In a legal twist that adds complexity to Donald Trump’s ongoing legal battles, his attorney, Steven Sadow, asserted on Friday that if the former U.S. president secures victory in the 2024 election, he should be exempt from facing trial in Georgia. The charges in question relate to allegations of Trump attempting to overturn the 2020 …

Legal Maneuvers: Trump’s Potential Election Triumph Sparks Debate Over Georgia Trial Timing Read More »

In a poignant development, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the inaugural female appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court, has passed away at the age of 93. The court confirmed her demise in Phoenix, attributing it to complications arising from advanced dementia and respiratory issues. Chief Justice John Roberts, reflecting on O’Connor’s historic role, remarked, “She …

Trailblazing Justice Sandra Day O’Connor Passes Away at 93, Leaving a Legacy of Centrism and Legal Prowess Read More »

In a pivotal decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has mandated the removal of a 1,000-foot-long floating barrier strategically placed by Texas along the Rio Grande river to impede the illegal influx of migrants from Mexico. The controversial move, seen as a victory for President Joe Biden’s administration, has ignited debates on environmental …

U.S. Appeals Court Orders Texas to Dismantle Rio Grande Barrier Amidst Controversy Read More »

In a pivotal decision, the Supreme Court stressed the imperative for expeditious trials when the detention of the accused is extended, asserting the right to a speedy trial enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. The bench, comprised of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi, rejected a bail plea in a money laundering case, …

Supreme Court Affirms Swift Trials as Essential in PMLA Cases Amidst Growing AI-Enhanced Money Laundering Threats Read More »

In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court delivered a resounding rejection of an appellant’s plea for bail, firmly asserting that the principle of parity cannot be invoked indiscriminately. The Court emphasized that the application of this principle hinges on a meticulous examination of the distinct roles played by each accused in the alleged offense, …

Supreme Court Upholds Individual Accountability in Bail Matters: Rejects Blanket Parity Pleas Read More »

In a groundbreaking verdict, the Supreme Court reshapes the landscape of anticipatory bail, asserting that both High Courts and Sessions Courts possess the authority to grant interim/transit anticipatory bail, even when the First Information Report (FIR) originates from a different state. The Court unequivocally overturned the judgments of Patna High Court and Calcutta High Court, …

Ensuring Jurisdictional Harmony: Supreme Court Unravels Rules for Transit Anticipatory Bail in Cross-State FIRs Read More »