In a surprising turn of events, the judiciary has intervened to rectify what it perceives as a hasty decision by the Army. Recently, the Supreme Court handed down a verdict directing the reinstatement of four army personnel who were unceremoniously discharged from their duties. The allegations levied against them revolved around the authenticity of their relationship certificates with former army personnel.
The apex court, in its wisdom, deemed the actions of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) as lacking in thoroughness. It highlighted the casual manner in which the tribunal approached the matter. By setting aside the order of discharge, the Supreme Court has not only granted reprieve to the affected individuals but also upheld the principle of fairness and due process.
This development underscores the importance of careful scrutiny and adherence to legal protocols, particularly in matters as consequential as the termination of military service. It serves as a reminder that justice must be tempered with diligence, ensuring that individuals are not unjustly deprived of their livelihoods based on hastily drawn conclusions.
