In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court elucidated on the validity of election nominations, emphasizing that not every flaw renders a nomination invalid. Only defects of significant consequence, capable of influencing the election outcome, warrant disqualification. The court underscored that mere non-disclosure, regardless of severity, does not automatically constitute a substantial defect.
The bench, comprised of Justices Anirudhha Bose and Sanjay Kumar, asserted the necessity of evaluating each case on its individual merits. They emphasized the distinction between substantial and insubstantial non-disclosures by candidates, emphasizing the need for candidates to disclose information that could unduly influence voters or materially affect the election outcome.
The court’s deliberation stemmed from a case involving Karikho Kri, whose election to the Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly was nullified by the Gauhati High Court. The contention revolved around Kri’s alleged failure to disclose his occupancy of a government-allotted MLA cottage in Itanagar and provide “no dues certificates” for rent, electricity, water, and telephone charges.
However, the Supreme Court dismissed these allegations, deeming them insubstantial. It clarified that information regarding utility payments and occupancy of government accommodation did not meet the threshold of substantial defects that could sway election results or constitute corrupt practices.
Drawing from precedent cases, the court emphasized that minor deviations from nomination requirements should not impede a candidate’s eligibility. They stressed the importance of substantial compliance over strict adherence to nomination forms, ensuring that candidates are not unfairly disqualified over minor technicalities.
In essence, the ruling underscores the court’s commitment to upholding the integrity of elections while ensuring that candidates are not unduly penalized for minor oversights. It reaffirms the principle that nominations should only be invalidated in cases where defects substantially impact the fairness and outcome of the electoral process.
