In a pivotal legal decision, the Supreme Court has enforced the stringent principle that parties exhibiting a lack of diligence during trial proceedings are precluded from attempting to introduce supplementary evidence at the appellate stage. The judgment, rooted in Section 391 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), serves as a resolute stance against tardy litigants seeking to bolster their cases with additional material after a lackadaisical trial phase.
The ruling, delivered on January 30, 2024, underscores the court’s commitment to upholding the sanctity of trial procedures. The apex court’s categorical stance maintains that parties must diligently present their case during the trial, with any failure in this regard curtailing their ability to augment their arguments with new evidence during the subsequent appeal process.
This legal precedent, devoid of any specific author attribution, signifies a crucial shift in the judicial landscape, compelling litigants to adhere to procedural diligence from the inception of their cases. The court’s ruling accentuates the importance of a thorough and robust trial phase, discouraging dilatory tactics and emphasizing the need for parties to present their strongest case during the initial legal proceedings.
