In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court delivered a significant verdict while rejecting Adani Power’s plea for Late Payment Surcharge (LPS) from Rajasthan Discoms. The crux of the matter lay in the Court’s elucidation that any miscellaneous application aimed at modifying or clarifying a judgment cannot be entertained post the disposal of the case.
The decision, handed down by a bench comprising Justices Aniruddha, marks a crucial delineation in the realm of legal procedure. The Court underscored that while the application to modify or clarify a judgment might find footing in exceptional circumstances, such instances remain rare and must meet stringent criteria.
This ruling sheds light on the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the sanctity of judicial orders and the finality of decisions made in courtrooms. It serves as a beacon, guiding legal practitioners and litigants alike in navigating the intricate terrain of post-disposal applications.
While the specifics of this case may vary, the underlying principle stands firm: the path to seeking modification or clarification post-disposal is one fraught with obstacles, accessible only in the rarest of circumstances.
