In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has underscored the importance of substance over form in corporate insolvency cases. In a judgment rendered on February 12, the apex court emphasized that a claim backed by evidence cannot be dismissed solely due to its presentation in a non-standard format.
The ruling stems from a case where a Resolution Applicant (RA) submitted a claim within the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) but in a form different from the prescribed format. Despite this variance, the court maintained that the essential element was the substantiated claim itself, rather than the manner of its presentation.
This verdict highlights the court’s commitment to upholding justice and ensuring that meritorious claims are not unjustly disregarded due to procedural technicalities. It signifies a departure from rigid adherence to formalities towards a more pragmatic approach that prioritizes the essence of justice.
The decision resonates as a beacon of hope for parties involved in insolvency proceedings, reassuring them that their rightful claims, supported by evidence, will receive due consideration irrespective of minor procedural irregularities.
In essence, the Supreme Court’s ruling stands as a testament to the principle that justice must prevail above all else, even if it means transcending conventional norms to achieve fairness and equity in legal proceedings.
