JK High Court: Husband’s Death Sentence Overturned in Dowry Case

Viewfinder:

The case revolved around a woman who succumbed to burn injuries within seven years of her marriage. Her husband was initially convicted of her murder based on a dying declaration that was later deemed inconsistent and unreliable. He had persistently demanded dowry, physically harassed, and inflicted cruelty on his wife. There were established records of the dowry payments and testimonies from the family members of the deceased, confirming the harassment.

Background:

Dowry-related crimes have been a long-standing issue in Indian society, and the case, filed under No.88/2012, became a flashpoint, highlighting the persisting menace of dowry and associated domestic violence. The case was appealed in a higher court after the trial court initially sentenced the husband to death.

Question(s) of Law:ย 

The primary question revolved around the reliability of the dying declaration used to convict the husband for murder under Section 302 RPC. Additionally, the case called into question the interpretation of Section 498-A RPC (a law against dowry harassment), Section 306 RPC (Abetment of suicide), and the evidentiary implications of Section 114-C of the J&K Evidence Act.

Order:

The court overturned the initial verdict of murder, citing inconsistencies in the dying declaration. Instead, the court found the husband guilty of abetment of suicide under Section 306 RPC and dowry harassment under Section 498-A RPC. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of ten years and three years respectively, along with fines.

Judge:

The judgment was delivered by Judges Rajesh Sekhri and Sanjay Dhar.

Lawyers:

Mr. Mohd. Latif Malik (Appellants), and Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG

Date of Order:

The order was given on July 20, 2023.

Title of the Case:

The case is referred to as Cr. Appeal No.88/2012.

The verdict has shed light on the grim realities of dowry-related offenses, highlighting the urgency for further reform and enforcement in this area. With the conviction under Section 306 RPC, the case also underscores the gravity of mental harassment leading to suicide, a perspective often overshadowed by physical violence.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Scroll to Top