One of Tesla’s significant stakeholders, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), has firmly opposed Elon Musk’s extravagant $56 billion compensation package. This move marks a pivotal decision by one of America’s largest pension funds, highlighting growing concerns over executive pay within the EV giant.
CalPERS, owning 9.5 million Tesla shares and holding a prominent position among the company’s investors, previously voted against Musk’s stock options in 2018. Their latest decision underscores apprehensions about the substantial financial reward being concentrated on a single individual, potentially diluting shareholder value.
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, faces scrutiny as Tesla navigates challenges including a significant decline in stock value this year and an anticipated drop in annual sales. Amidst these challenges, Musk’s leadership faces a crucial test during Tesla’s upcoming shareholder meeting.
While Florida’s pension board has voiced support for Musk’s compensation plan, citing robust pay-for-performance metrics, CalPERS’ dissent underscores broader shareholder sentiment regarding the fairness and prudence of such lavish executive compensation packages.
Additionally, Florida’s State Board of Administration has expressed reservations, voting against Tesla director Kimbal Musk and the company’s proposed relocation to Texas, citing concerns over director independence.
This dissent within Tesla’s shareholder base comes on the heels of a Delaware court’s rejection of the record compensation package earlier this year, emphasizing the contentious nature of Musk’s payday despite initial shareholder approval in 2018.
As Tesla prepares for its shareholder meeting, the debate over Musk’s compensation package continues to draw attention, reflecting broader concerns over corporate governance and executive compensation practices in America’s tech industry.
