🇮🇳

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has emphasized the necessity for cautious and deliberate consideration when dealing with the recruitment processes implemented by recruitment agencies. The Court’s verdict, delivered on March 5th, underscores the importance of meticulous examination rather than hastened judgments in such matters. The case in question revolved around an appellant, a …

Proceeding with Prudence: Supreme Court’s Stance on Recruitment Agencies Read More »

In a seismic decision that reverberates through the corridors of power, the Supreme Court has delivered a resounding blow to the entrenched nexus of corruption plaguing the heart of Indian democracy. In a departure from a quarter-century-old precedent, the highest judicial authority has unequivocally declared that the cloak of parliamentary privilege shall no longer shield …

Supreme Court Unveils Epochal Ruling: Corruption and Bribery No Longer Shielded by Parliamentary Privileges Read More »

In a groundbreaking ruling, the Supreme Court asserted that the commission of a bribery offense is instantaneous upon the acceptance of illegal gratification, without dependence on the actual fulfillment of promised actions. A pivotal 7-judge Constitution Bench, led by the Chief Justice of India, dismantled the notion that legislative immunity shields lawmakers who accept bribes …

Supreme Court Rules: Bribery Offense Complete Upon Acceptance, Regardless of Subsequent Action Read More »

In a monumental declaration, the Supreme Court, in its recent ruling, has underscored the pivotal status of the Rajya Sabha within the foundational fabric of the Indian Constitution. This landmark verdict, delivered on Monday (March 4), elucidates the intricate interplay between legislative privileges and the sanctity of Rajya Sabha elections under Article 194. The constitutional …

Supreme Court Asserts Rajya Sabha’s Integral Role within Basic Constitutional Framework Read More »

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the prerogative of Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) to determine interest rates on loans, emphasizing that borrowers cannot contest the interest rates after repaying the loan amount. The decision, handed down by Justices A.S. Bopanna and M.M. Sundresh, emphasized the contractual nature of loan agreements and upheld the …

New Perspectives: Supreme Court Upholds NBFC’s Right on Interest Rates Read More »

In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court rendered a verdict stating that the burden of personal contracts of a deceased individual does not fall upon their legal representatives. However, the Court emphasized that any monetary obligations must be duly discharged by the estate. The ruling came as a result of an appeal stemming from …

Supreme Court Rules: Legal Representatives Exempt from Personal Contracts of Deceased, But Monetary Liabilities Must be Settled Read More »

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court wielded its discretionary power, denying a plaintiff’s bid for specific performance due to the dissemination of false or inaccurate information. The court’s decision underscored the discretionary and equitable nature of decreeing specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Within the intricate tapestry of legal …

Court Asserts Discretion in Granting Specific Performance, Despite Plaintiff’s False Statements Read More »

In a landmark decision on Friday, the Supreme Court underscored the critical importance of adhering to Section 52A of the NDPS Act in cases involving narcotics and psychotropic substances. The court ruled that failure to comply with this mandate during the collection of samples for Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) testing renders any subsequent FSL report …

New Ruling by Supreme Court Renders FSL Reports Invalid Without Proper Sample Collection Protocol Read More »

In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court stood firm on the principle that mere words uttered in a moment of anger, devoid of any intent to cause harm or consequences, cannot be construed as instigation for suicide. The Court reaffirmed the necessity for the prosecution to establish beyond doubt that the accused’s actions or omissions …

Supreme Court Upholds Distinction: Anger Not Equal to Instigation in Abetment Cases Read More »

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court underscored a fundamental legal principle governing contract disputes. The court emphasized that its role in adjudicating disputes between parties is constrained by the terms and conditions explicitly agreed upon in the contract. Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sanjay Kumar, forming the bench, made this assertion, reiterating the judiciary’s duty …

 Supreme Court Affirms Legal Principle: Contract Terms Binding in Dispute Resolution Read More »