Editorial correction — 2 October 2026. The 2023 version materially misdescribed Order XXII. It treated death as causing automatic abatement under rule 1, said marriage of a female party could cause abatement, attributed insolvency…
Editorial correction — 3 October 2026. The former version cited irrelevant sections, misstated section 20 as an immovable-property rule, and suggested that disobedience of document or evidence orders itself produces an ex parte decree.…
Editorial correction — 3 October 2026. The former page contained drafting prompts and broad claims instead of a reliable procedure. It incorrectly described appeal as a fundamental right and grouped unrelated rules as if…
Editorial correction — 1 October 2026. The 2023 version misstated the defendant’s procedural sequence, suggesting that a written statement and replication ordinarily followed the initial summons. It also said that oral evidence was generally…
Editorial correction — 3 October 2026. The former version mixed India’s CPC with US Federal Rule 16 and England and Wales CPR Part 16, although those provisions belong to different legal systems. It also…
Editorial correction — 15 October 2026. The former note presented an execution petition and a fresh civil suit as two generally interchangeable recovery methods and suggested that a licence breach automatically resolves insurer liability.…
Editorial correction — 16 October 2026. The former note misdated Salib @ Shalu @ Salim v State of Uttar Pradesh as 24 August 2023; the official judgment is dated 8 August 2023. It also…
Editorial correction — 11 October 2026. The original 2023 note stated categorically that courts had no power to modify an arbitral award under sections 34 or 37. That proposition is no longer current. A…
Editorial correction — 11 October 2026. The original “Source of Funds” paragraph inaccurately suggested that bank-FD interest falls outside mutuality because it is generated only from non-members. The Supreme Court’s holding is broader: mutuality…
Editorial correction — 15 October 2026. The former article was a time-bound summary of the Supreme Court’s 2023 directions and described a support person as a “guardian ad litem” without explaining that this was…
Search judgments, official documents, oral arguments and the accumulated record behind the daily edition.
A deep searchable record of court proceedings.
Judgments · Documents · Practice Notes · Jurisdictions · Events
Court Cast is a vibrant, collaborative platform designed specifically for legal professionals worldwide. Embrace the opportunity to connect, share insights, and grow with a diverse network of attorneys, legal scholars, and industry experts. Court Cast offers a unique space for members to discuss the latest legal trends, share case studies, and engage in thought-provoking environment.