In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has reshaped the landscape of legal procedures, acknowledging that an application for further investigation can serve as a legitimate form of protest petition. This groundbreaking decision signifies a departure from conventional norms, emphasizing the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring justice prevails, even in unconventional avenues. The essence of the …
The corridors of justice echoed with a significant decree as the Supreme Court issued a resolute directive to its registry, urging the cessation of labeling Trial Courts as ‘Lower Courts’. “Even the records stemming from Trial Courts should shed the moniker of ‘Lower Court Record (LCR)’,” remarked Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan with …
Supreme Court Issues Directive: Trial Courts No Longer to be Termed ‘Lower Courts’ Read More »
In a recent landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has articulated a significant precedent regarding contempt of court charges. The apex court clarified that a mere delay in adhering to a court order does not necessarily constitute contempt, unless there is clear evidence of deliberate or willful defiance. The bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Sudhanshu Dhulia, …
Judicial Leniency: Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Contempt Read More »
In a surprising turn of events, the judiciary has intervened to rectify what it perceives as a hasty decision by the Army. Recently, the Supreme Court handed down a verdict directing the reinstatement of four army personnel who were unceremoniously discharged from their duties. The allegations levied against them revolved around the authenticity of their …
High Court Overturns Army’s Discharge of Four Personnel Amid Certificate Controversy Read More »
In a bid to streamline legal proceedings and minimize delays, the Supreme Court has issued directives for the prompt acquisition of soft copies of High Court and Trial Court records once leave to appeal is granted in cases challenging convictions or acquittals. During a recent hearing, a Bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal …
Efficient Handling of Legal Records Urged by Supreme Court Read More »
In a recent rebuke, the Supreme Court lambasted Bihar Police for adopting a stance that expected accused individuals to prove their innocence during investigations. This approach, the Court declared, was not only unacceptable but also shocking. During a hearing of a criminal appeal against the Patna High Court’s decision to deny anticipatory bail, the Division …
Supreme Court Slams Bihar Police: Innocent Until Proven Guilty Read More »
In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court underscored a stringent stance on granting bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). The case in question involved an individual accused of promoting the Khalistani terror movement, a matter of grave concern. The apex court, comprising Justices MM Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, unequivocally emphasized that …
UAPA Bail Criteria: Supreme Court Sets Firm Precedent Amidst Terrorism Charges Read More »
In a pivotal decision, the Supreme Court has upheld a crucial rule within the framework of Chartered Accountants’ regulations. This ruling maintains the authority of the Board of Discipline to refer cases of potential misconduct to the Disciplinary Committee, even when the Director (Discipline) initially finds no guilt. Rendered by Justices PS Narasimha and Aravind …
Upholding Integrity: Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Oversight in Chartered Accountancy Read More »
In a recent development, the Supreme Court has voiced its dismay over the National Green Tribunal’s (NGT) practice of issuing ex parte orders and imposing penalties without due process. The judgment, penned by Justice PS Narasimha, highlights the concerning trend of unilateral decision-making within the tribunal, which the Court laments has become all too common. …
Supreme Court Demands Procedural Integrity from NGT, Criticizes Ex-Parte Orders Read More »
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court meticulously dissected the nuances of criminal intent, stressing the necessity for a nuanced approach rather than a blanket application of legal provisions. The case, revolving around a tragic murder, saw the Court uphold the life imprisonment for three accused while modifying the sentence for another. A pivotal aspect …
Legal Precision Prevails: Supreme Court Emphasizes Individual Intent in Crime Cases Read More »
Court Cast is a vibrant, collaborative platform designed specifically for legal professionals worldwide. Embrace the opportunity to connect, share insights, and grow with a diverse network of attorneys, legal scholars, and industry experts. Court Cast offers a unique space for members to discuss the latest legal trends, share case studies, and engage in thought-provoking environment.
