Amidst the grandeur of the American Bar Association (ABA) in Washington, D.C., a significant resolve is on the brink of public proclamation. A collective effort by nearly a dozen ABA entities has birthed a resolution set to oppose laws inhibiting the teaching of race or gender-related subjects and the banning of pertinent books.
This bold stance, submitted to the ABA’s House of Delegates, vehemently opposes any federal, state, or local laws curbing the teaching and inclusion of studies concerning the experiences, roles, and contributions of individuals or groups based on their race, gender identity, sexual orientation, or religion. The resolution also takes a firm stand against restrictions on books and other educational resources addressing these critical topics.
The House is poised to cast its decisive vote on this groundbreaking proposal on the concluding day of the ABA’s Midyear meeting in Louisville, Kentucky.
A comprehensive report accompanying the resolution asserts that legislative endeavors across the nation to restrict teaching about race jeopardize students’ freedom to learn and obstruct their access to a comprehensive, truthful education. The sponsors argue that such restrictions impede students from acquiring the essential tools to navigate and address future societal issues. Moreover, they contend that banning these teachings denies students a sense of belonging rooted in the reflection of their history in their education.
The resolution’s advocates specifically highlight Florida’s 2022 Stop WOKE Act, pointing out its prohibition on discussing race in classrooms. Subject to a temporary injunction due to First Amendment challenges, this law significantly hampers any discussion of slavery or historical marginalization. The report identifies similar bans gaining momentum in various states and localities.
Proponents of these laws argue that discussions about racism create divisions among students and make them uncomfortable. In contrast, the ABA report counters that laws ostensibly aimed at averting discussions of systemic racism end up eliminating any discourse on race in the classroom.
The resolution report emphasizes, “Curricular bans pose a threat to a child’s right to an honest and quality education and deprive them of the tools to make informed decisions as an adult partaking in the democratic process.”
Notably, the ABA’s House of Delegates is also set to consider the final approval of a new law school accreditation rule mandating campuses to adopt free speech policies that encourage and support the free expression of ideas. In this pursuit, the ABA stands not just for legal principles but as a staunch advocate for the preservation of educational freedom.
Stay informed with the latest developments by subscribing to The Afternoon Docket for a daily dose of legal news.
