In a judicial thunderclap, the Supreme Court has hammered the State of Telangana with a hefty penalty of Rs. 5 Lakhs, pointing fingers directly at those officials who wielded the pen in the creation and submission of erroneous affidavits during ongoing legal proceedings.
The crux of the matter revolves around a contentious issue: the conversion of reserved forest land into private property, a decision initially made by the High Court through the exercise of its review authority. This move, despite a prior ruling clearly stating the private party’s failure to establish rightful ownership over the forest land, raised eyebrows on the bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and S.V.N. Bhatti.
In a sharp reversal of the High Court’s judgment, the apex court lambasted the judiciary for its overreach, expressing astonishment at the gratuitous bestowal of forest land upon an individual who failed to validate their claim. “The High Court’s generosity in entertaining the review petition and overturning a well-founded judgment is perplexing,” remarked the court.
Furthermore, the court took aim at the flip-flopping stance of the Appellants-State of Telangana regarding the disputed property. Initially asserting the land’s forest status, they later formed a committee that advocated for its exclusion in favor of private claimants, a move that drew sharp rebuke from the bench.
The Supreme Court did not mince words in its censure of the District Collector’s actions, highlighting a dereliction of duty by state officials entrusted with safeguarding and conserving forest resources. This failure, the court emphasized, underscored a systemic breakdown in the protection of vital ecological assets.
Questioning the High Court’s decision to convert forest land into private property post-decree, the court expressed bewilderment at the reliance placed on evidence introduced after the fact, particularly when the land had already been designated as part of a reserved forest.
Concluding its judgment with a resounding decree, the court levied a substantial fine on both the appellants and respondents, directing payment to the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) within two months. Moreover, the State of Telangana was empowered to conduct an investigation into the culpability of officers involved in the submission of misleading affidavits, with the mandate to recover costs from those responsible.
In the wake of this legal saga, the importance of preserving forests as a bulwark against climate change echoes loudly, underscoring the imperative for robust environmental stewardship in the face of mounting ecological challenges.
Loading...
Reload document 
Open in new tab 
