A U.S. judge has temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to downsize the federal workforce through an unconventional buyout scheme. This move has granted a brief reprieve to labor unions that argue the proposal is both rushed and legally dubious.
The decision came from U.S. District Judge George O’Toole in Boston, who extended a block on the administration’s initiative while deliberating whether to impose a longer injunction. The proposal, aimed at over 2 million federal civilian employees, promised continued pay and benefits without requiring work until October—a plan critics claim lacks financial guarantees beyond March.
Central to the controversy is Trump’s partnership with billionaire Elon Musk, tasked with spearheading the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency.” While the entity lacks formal status, Musk’s sweeping authority has alarmed federal employees and spurred public protests, especially over his team’s access to sensitive government systems.
The unions, supported by Democratic state attorneys general, have filed multiple lawsuits against the administration’s attempts to overhaul the government structure. Critics argue that the plan jeopardizes critical agencies, disrupts essential services, and undermines the nation’s workforce stability.
Among the disputed actions are efforts to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and curtail the operations of independent entities like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Federal judges have issued temporary blocks on several initiatives, including Musk’s access to Treasury Department systems.
While Trump has defended these measures as necessary to streamline government operations, opposition voices highlight the broader implications for public services and governance. The administration faces a growing wave of legal challenges, signaling a prolonged battle over the scope of executive power and the future of federal employment.
