Amidst the burgeoning landscape of Chapter 11 filings, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey stands firm in its resolve to maintain a randomized approach to case assignments, eschewing the trend of funneling large cases to select judges.
Chief Judge Michael Kaplan, addressing concerns raised by creditor rights advocates and legal scholars, reaffirmed the court’s commitment to impartiality. In response to a letter urging against the establishment of a specialized “complex case” panel, Kaplan emphasized that all judges within the district possess the requisite expertise to tackle intricate matters.
The decision comes amidst a routine review of the court’s Chapter 11 rules, which have remained unchanged for nearly two decades. Contrary to speculation, Kaplan stressed that the update isn’t a ploy to attract bankruptcies but rather a proactive effort to enhance case management.
This stance starkly contrasts with recent developments in other jurisdictions, such as the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, where a concentration of major Chapter 11 cases has led to the allocation of cases to a select few judges. The Creditor Rights Coalition, which raised concerns over such practices, commended New Jersey’s commitment to randomized assignments, echoing calls for broader adoption across bankruptcy courts.
As the legal landscape evolves, New Jersey’s steadfast adherence to equitable case allocation serves as a beacon of integrity, ensuring that justice remains blind and impartial within the realm of bankruptcy proceedings.
