In a decisive blow to the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) efforts, a New York state appeals court has dismissed its attempt to halt a corruption investigation led by state Attorney General Letitia James. The NRA, known for its staunch defense of gun rights, alleged political motivations behind the probe.
The unanimous ruling by a five-judge panel from the Appellate Division in Manhattan unfolds just 1-1/2 weeks ahead of the scheduled January 8 trial. Attorney General James seeks remedies, including the removal of NRA Chief Executive Wayne LaPierre.
James, a Democrat, initiated legal action in August 2020, accusing the NRA of diverting millions to fund lavish expenditures for officials, notably LaPierre. The lawsuit further alleged the absence of board approval for conflicts of interest, insider transactions, and retaliation against whistleblowers.
The NRA, in its bid for dismissal, contended that James was infringing on its First Amendment rights and accused her of selective enforcement, particularly in her unsuccessful attempt to dissolve the organization.
However, the appeals court upheld James’ authority to investigate and sue the NRA under state laws governing nonprofits. It dismissed the NRA’s claims, citing “ample evidence of malfeasance” uncovered by James.
Lawyers for the NRA and James’ office offered no immediate comments following Thursday’s decision, which echoes a June 2022 ruling by Justice Joel Cohen of the New York state court. Cohen, who will preside over the trial, had blocked James’ attempt to dissolve the NRA in March 2022.
The trial, set to commence on January 2 with jury selection, may span six weeks. Jurors will evaluate potential repayments by four current and former NRA officials, including LaPierre. Additionally, they may recommend the removal of LaPierre and NRA Secretary John Frazer, with Cohen making the final decision on removal requests.
As the legal battle intensifies, the NRA faces a challenging trial that could reshape its leadership and financial landscape.
