In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court delivered a resounding blow to the government’s attempt to sidestep environmental regulations for linear projects. The judgment, issued on March 21, reverberated across the nation as it quashed a contentious amendment seeking to waive environmental clearances for earth extraction in projects like roads and pipelines.
Deemed as a reckless departure from environmental prudence, the amendment had sparked widespread outcry among environmentalists and concerned citizens alike. Critics argued that such a blanket exemption would pave the way for unchecked exploitation of natural resources, potentially unleashing irreversible harm upon delicate ecosystems.
The apex court minced no words in its condemnation of the amendment, labeling it as “completely unguided” and, therefore, arbitrary. By nullifying the exemption, the Court reaffirmed the sanctity of environmental safeguards, emphasizing the imperative of balanced development that respects ecological integrity.
This ruling underscores the judiciary’s pivotal role in upholding environmental stewardship and ensuring accountability in governance. It serves as a potent reminder that the pursuit of progress must never come at the expense of environmental degradation.
In the wake of this judgment, stakeholders are urged to adopt a more conscientious approach towards infrastructure development, one that harmonizes human needs with environmental preservation. Forging a sustainable future demands not just legal compliance but a collective commitment to safeguarding the planet for generations to come.
Loading...
Reload document 
Open in new tab 
