The Trump administration has taken its first major legal battle to the U.S. Supreme Court, pushing for the removal of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel—a watchdog agency that protects federal whistleblowers. The move escalates an ongoing power struggle between the White House and independent federal agencies.
The Justice Department has requested the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court’s decision that temporarily blocked Dellinger’s removal. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued a restraining order on February 12, halting the termination, stating that firing Dellinger without cause directly violates federal law meant to shield the agency’s independence.
Dellinger, appointed by former President Joe Biden, was set to serve until 2029. He challenged his dismissal after receiving an abrupt email on February 7 stating that he had been fired “effective immediately.” His lawsuit argues that Trump’s move exceeded presidential authority, as federal law only permits removal for specific misconduct.
The administration, however, views the judicial interference as an overreach. Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris called the ruling an “unprecedented assault on the separation of powers,” asserting that courts should not dictate presidential staffing decisions.
The Supreme Court’s response to this case could set the tone for Trump’s broader efforts to restructure the federal government by removing leaders of independent agencies. With a conservative majority—including three justices appointed by Trump—the court’s decision may have lasting implications for executive power.
Beyond Dellinger, the administration has already moved aggressively to reshape federal oversight, having dismissed 17 inspectors general last month without explanation. The Office of Special Counsel plays a key role in safeguarding civil servants from retaliation and enforcing the Hatch Act, which restricts political activities by government employees.
With the Supreme Court now in the spotlight, the case tests the limits of presidential authority and the legal safeguards designed to keep independent agencies from political influence. The outcome could redefine the boundaries between the executive branch and federal watchdogs.
