Editorial correction — 12 October 2026. The original article did not identify a jurisdiction and presented generic “discovery,” e-discovery, jury and motion practice as though they formed a single civil-procedure system. Its former India…
Editorial correction — 8 October 2026. The earlier version said pleadings must state the law relied on, said a decree could be executed only by the court that passed it, and listed “appellate appeals”…
Editorial correction — 7 October 2026. The former guide misidentified Order XXI rule 26 as the transfer provision, treated rules 1–6 as receiver rules, labelled rule 21 as set-off, mixed arrest with attachment objections,…
Editorial correction — 12 October 2026. The former note inaccurately suggested that a section 148A caveat could universally be lodged in the Supreme Court, tribunals, forums and commissions, supplied a nationwide affidavit and document…
Editorial correction — 12 October 2026. The former article incorrectly defined “Ghair Marusi” as a tenant who had abandoned the land, asserted transfer and surrender rules without a pinpointed J&K provision, cited a purported…
Editorial correction — 7 October 2026. The former guide overstated Article 20(2) as a bar on multiple convictions based on the same facts and described Article 20(3) as applying only during trial. This replacement…
Editorial correction — 13 October 2026. The former note treated Standing Orders 1/88 and 1/89 as the current sampling code and described a conflict between spot sampling and section 52A without accounting for the…
Editorial correction — 13 October 2026. The former note converted fact-specific weaknesses in Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh v State of Chhattisgarh into broad propositions about notices, procedure and co-accused acquittals. This…
Editorial correction — 14 October 2026. The former note contained three material overstatements: it described section 52 of the NDPS Act as the sampling provision; suggested that an arresting or seizing officer may never…
Editorial correction — 13 October 2026. The former note answered a late-plaintiff-testimony question almost entirely through Order XVIII rule 17 and section 151. That conflated three different issues: a party appearing after its other…
Search judgments, official documents, oral arguments and the accumulated record behind the daily edition.
A deep searchable record of court proceedings.
Judgments · Documents · Practice Notes · Jurisdictions · Events
Court Cast is a vibrant, collaborative platform designed specifically for legal professionals worldwide. Embrace the opportunity to connect, share insights, and grow with a diverse network of attorneys, legal scholars, and industry experts. Court Cast offers a unique space for members to discuss the latest legal trends, share case studies, and engage in thought-provoking environment.