[ivory-search id=”103446″ title=”Practice Notes Search”]
Editorial correction — 14 October 2026. The former note treated “special case proceedings” as though it were a defined CPC category and said appeals from interlocutory applications were subject to the court’s discretion. The…
Editorial correction — 6 October 2026. The 2023 version incorrectly said cross-examination was restricted to matters stated in examination-in-chief and treated affidavit evidence as something the court merely “may allow” when the interests of…
Editorial correction — 6 October 2026. The 2023 version incorrectly said disobedience of an attachment-before-judgment order may attract Order XXI rule 32 or Order XXXIX rule 2A CPC. Those provisions concern enforcement of specified…
Editorial correction — 7 October 2026. The former note incorrectly suggested that section 151 could avoid section 148 limits, cure late court fees outside section 149, modify decrees after judgment and admit evidence after…
Editorial correction — 9 October 2026. The former note omitted the proviso to Order VI rule 17, which restricts amendments after trial has commenced unless despite due diligence the matter could not have been…
Editorial correction — 4 October 2026. The former note incorrectly described section 10 as discretionary and misstated the qualifying earlier-court test. This replacement follows the operative central text: where every statutory condition is met,…
Editorial correction — 9 October 2026. The former note treated several unrelated remedies—including commissions to examine witnesses and matrimonial custody or maintenance—as generic interim orders under section 94 and Order XXXIX. It also said…
Editorial correction — 9 October 2026. The former note incorrectly stated that Order XXXIX rule 2A lets the court set aside a contract or disposition, that Order XLI rule 4 authorises the appellate court…
Editorial correction — 9 October 2026. The former note imported the U.S. labels “claim preclusion” and “collateral estoppel,” treated section 10 res sub judice as an “exception” to res judicata, omitted constructive res judicata,…
Editorial correction — 8 October 2026. The 2023 version used U.S.-style expressions such as “motion to dismiss,” “motion for summary judgment,” “motion to compel discovery,” “notice of appeal” and “briefs” as though they described…
Search judgments, official documents, oral arguments and the accumulated record behind the daily edition.
A deep searchable record of court proceedings.
Judgments · Documents · Practice Notes · Jurisdictions · Events
Court Cast is a vibrant, collaborative platform designed specifically for legal professionals worldwide. Embrace the opportunity to connect, share insights, and grow with a diverse network of attorneys, legal scholars, and industry experts. Court Cast offers a unique space for members to discuss the latest legal trends, share case studies, and engage in thought-provoking environment.